|
Documents
Thank you for your interest in the Curriculum-Centered Strategic Planning Model developed by Michael G. Dolence. Attached is Version 2003-2 of the model in PDF format. This document contains the CCSPM Overview in Simple Block Diagram. It is a companion to the full diagram and is useful when first introducing the CCSPM Concept. This document contains the CCSPM Diagram Circle Version. It is a companion to the full diagram. It is very simple and may be useful when first introducing the CCSPM Concept. Integrated Curriculum Assessment Model (Posted 3/25/2004, V.2003.3)is a digram being shared publicly for the first time. The write up of how to use it is not yet done but I have had many requests for the model and provide it here. It is designed to provide a conceptual framework that articulates an intgrated view of assessment. Please share your thoughts and suggestions directly to me at mgd@mgdolence.com
Version 2003.7 posted December 13, 2003. PDF Format, 8.5 x 11 inches Color. This diagram is available in Visio Format by emailing mgd@mgdolence.com. Thank you for your interest in the Learner-Centered Curriculum Framework developed by Michael G. Dolence. Attached is Version 2003-2 of the Framework in PDF format. Thank you for your interest in the Learner-Centered Curriculum Framework developed by Michael G. Dolence. Attached is Version 2003-2 of the Action Steps for Implementing the LCC Framework in PDF format. The University of Michigan Law School (Law School), follows an official admissions policy that seeks to achieve student body diversity through compliance with Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke, 438 U. S. 265. This Case No. 02–241 was argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on April 1, 2003, the court decided June 23, 2003. Petitioners filed this class action alleging that the University of Michigan’s (University) College of Literature, Science, and the Arts use of racial preferences in undergraduate admissions violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and 42 U. S. C. §1981. This Case No. 02–516. was argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on April 1, 2003, the court decided June 23, 2003.
|